U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Reinstate Arizona Law Criminalizing the Harbor of Illegal Immigrants

Arizona’s 2010 Immigration Law has sparked controversy ever since it was enacted. As a federal appeals lawyer explains, the U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in on a particularly controversial provision that made it illegal to harbor illegal immigrants.

The Background of Arizona’s Immigration Reform
Arizona has been a bellwether state in terms of immigration reform. In 2010, the Arizona legislature passed a sweeping immigration package, which was then signed into law by Governor Jan Brewer. As a Texas federal appeals lawyer explains, among other things, the law provided criminal penalties for individuals who were caught harboring illegal immigrants in their homes. Additionally, the reforms made it illegal to entice an immigrant to cross the border illegally with the promise of safe harbor.

The Latest U.S. Supreme Court Ruling
As an appeals attorney can explain, Arizona’s law was then challenged on various Constitutional grounds. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit struck down the illegal safe harbor provision. The state then appealed that ruling all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court essentially left that lower court’s ruling intact by refusing to hear the case. Appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court are not automatically given a hearing. The Court has wide discretion to hear or reject cases without giving them a full hearing.

Other Recent Rulings Made by the U.S. Supreme Court
While the high court has struck down other provisions of the Arizona law, they have also curtailed other state’s immigration laws. For example, the Court struck down provisions of immigration laws in Pennsylvania and Texas related to mandatory reporting of illegal immigrants. Those laws required tenants to disclose their status in a way that would be reported to immigration authorities and then penalized landlords who rented to them.

To discuss your legal issues with an experienced federal appeals lawyer with a proven track record of getting results for their clients, contact the Brownstone Law group. Call 855.776.2773 to set up an appointment for an initial consultation.

Related Post

thumbnail
hover

Federal Appeals Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania Appellate Process for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals A federal criminal conviction in the federal courts of Pennsylvania is...

  • Posted by bsl
thumbnail
hover

Veronica Perez Law Suit Against Elkis...

S.M. v Los Angeles Unified School District Appeal   Courts have long held that school teachers and their supervisors are responsible f...

  • Posted by bsl
thumbnail
hover

Social Media Evidence Admitted into Court...

A Social Media Appeal: Admission of Social Media Post As Evidence   Since its inception social media has created quite a conundrum in c...

  • Posted by bsl