Michigan Appellate Law Firm

Protecting your rights in every appeal.

At Brownstone Law, we are expert lawyers in Michigan providing legal advice on appellate cases. Whether you require the services of a court appeals attorney near you, a criminal defense attorney in Grand Rapids, or lawyers in Michigan for a free consultation, our staff will ensure that your case receives the attention it deserves. From civil disputes or intricate criminal appeals, we are here to guide you through the process with clarity and expertise.

Speak with our experienced lawyer in Michigan to review your case—absolutely free.

Civil Appeal Attorney Services in Michigan

Our Michigan Lawyers offer complete representation of a broad scope of civil appeal cases:

Securities and Fraud

Guidance from an experienced Ann Arbor investment fraud lawyer.

Tax and RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations)

Expert handling of complex tax and criminal civil matters.

Medical, Medicare, and Medicaid

Healthcare disputes and regulatory compliance

Intellectual Property

Guard your inventions, copyrights, and trademarks.

Business Torts and Corporate Investigations

Support for corporate disputes and investigations.

Broker-Dealer Issues

Addressing legal matters in financial transactions.

Insurance Recovery

Fight for rightful claims and recoveries.

Eminent Domain and Takings

Ensure Fair Compensation in Property Disputes.

Healthcare Appeals

Navigate complex healthcare regulations and denials.

Locations We Serve

Our business and civil appeals lawyers handle complex appellate matters before the Supreme Court of Michigan.

Criminal Appeals in Michigan: Protect Your Rights

Our Michigan criminal lawyers provide expert legal representation to safeguard your rights at every stage of the criminal appellate process.

We may represent clients on appeal and handle habeas corpus petitions. A criminal appeal in Michigan is granted to a federal defendant to rectify any errors made during his trial. The error could have been significant and influenced the court’s decision.

Our law firm can appeal jury verdicts and issues decided by the judge, who must authorize the introduction of new witnesses or evidence that may impact the outcome of the case. Brownstone Law can also appeal these rulings and the objections raised during this process to form the grounds for an appeal. Read more about the Michigan Supreme Court and appeals in Michigan.

Post-Conviction Relief

Post-conviction relief may be available if there was an error in the trial or hearing that resulted in a conviction. We assist clients with:

Post-conviction litigation is a unique legal area that may be available to people who have been convicted of a crime after appeal rights have been exhausted. You may also qualify to withdraw your plea.

Michigan Federal Appeals: Expert Legal Representation

When facing federal charges, the appeals process can be complex and overwhelming. Our Michigan federal criminal attorneys work to identify trial errors, protect your rights, and develop strong strategies for appeal. We fight for clients across Michigan to ensure fair outcomes in federal appellate courts.

Areas of Expertise in Federal Appeals

Why Choose Brownstone Law for Your Appeal?

Experienced appeal lawyers in Michigan with a proven track record.
Personalized legal strategies tailored to your case.
Transparent communication with regular updates
Free consultation for all new clients seeking a lawyer in Michigan

News and Publications: Michigan Appeals

RON VANALSTINE, and JOAN VANALSTINE v. LAND O’LAKES PURINA FEEDS, LLC

Plaintiffs operate a dairy farm in Eaton County. Defendant is a Minnesota corporation that manufactures and distributes animal feed and related products. Diversified Farms, LLC (Diversified) is a distributor of those products in Michigan. In July 2008, Diversified executed a Credit Application and Agreement (the Credit Agreement) with defendant that included a disclaimer of warranties and a remedy-limiting provision. “A motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual sufficiency of a claim, and is appropriately granted when, except as to the amount of damages, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Tomra of North America, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury.

We review de novo issues of statutory and contractual interpretation. Heritage Resources, Inc v Caterpillar Fin Servs Corp, 284 Mich App 617, 632; 774 NW2d 332 (2009). Plaintiffs were not parties to the Credit Agreement. Read more about this civil appeal in Michigan: Michigan Appeals.

United States v. Jerry Duval

June 4th, 2013, Case No. 12-2338

Appellants challenge the constitutionality of the Michigan Marijuana Act Read More about this Constitutional Appeal by clicking here. Jerry Duval Brief in Federal Court – Medical Marijuana

Bhan v. Battle Creek Health

August 19th, 2013, Case No. 13-1682

This case arises out of the suspension of Dr. Raakesh Bhan’s medical staff privileges at two Michigan hospitals: Battle Creek Health System (“BCHS”), located in Calhoun County, and Borgess Medical Center (“Borgess”), located in Kalamazoo County. Read more about this Michigan appeal here: Bhan v. Battle Creek Health – United States Court of Appeals – Western District of Michigan

United States v. Jonathan Agbebiyi

November 25th, 2013, Case No. 12-2559, Robert L. Sirianni, Esq.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 34(a), Appellant, Jonathan Agbebiyi, M.D. (“Dr. Agbebiyi”), respectfully requests oral argument because the Court’s consideration of the issues presented by this appeal may be assisted or advanced by the presence of counsel before the Court to comment upon the issues and respond to inquiries from the Court. Read more about this Michigan appeal here: USA v. Agbebiyi – United States Court of Appeals – Eastern District of Michigan

Lashawn Redmond v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

December 2, 2014, Case No. 1-0111348.

This is a civil appeal in Michigan. As the concurrence states: Moody was wrongly decided on both legal and practical grounds and should be overruled. Pursuant to MCR 7.215(J)(1), the Court must follow Moody despite a concurring judge’s disagreement with it. This would normally lead the Court to request a special conflict panel pursuant to MCR 7.215(J)(2). However, because the Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal in Moody, the Court believe such a request would be inappropriate.

Read more about this Michigan civil appeal here: Michigan Civil Appeal – Redmond v. State Farm Mutual Automobile

Mattie King v. Park West Galleries, Inc.

December 2, 2014, Case No. 314188

This case stems from a cruise plaintiff took in April of 1999 with her now deceased husband. While aboard the ship, plaintiff and her late husband decided to attend a shipboard auction put on by defendant Park West Galleries, Inc. During this auction, plaintiff purchased a complete set of Salvador Dali’s Divine Comedy collection. This art collection was represented by Park West’s auctioneer as a good investment that would increase in value over time. Further, defendant’s auctioneer stated that these works had been signed by Dali.

Plaintiff purchased the works at the auction for $165,000. Plaintiff, as part of the purchase, received certificates of authenticity and appraisals to ensure that representations made by Park West’s auctioneer were accurate. Defendant Albert Scaglione, the CEO of defendant Park West Galleries, Inc., signed the documents, and they were mailed to plaintiff after the cruise was over.

Read more about this Michigan civil appeal here: Mattie King v. Park West Galleries

People v. Leon Finnie, Jr.

December 2, 2014, Case No. 314200

Defendant appeals as of right his jury trial convictions of assault with intent to commit murder, MCL 750.83; torture, MCL 750.85; and two counts of unlawful imprisonment, MCL 750.349b. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 20 to 40 years’ imprisonment for the assault with intent to commit murder conviction, 20 to 40 years for the torture conviction, and 8 to 15 years for each of the unlawful imprisonment convictions. Because there was sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of assault with intent to murder, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony or allowing the late endorsement.

Read more about this Michigan criminal appeal here: Michigan Criminal Appeal – People of the State of Michigan v. Leon Finnie

Get Appeal Evaluation

Our experienced attorneys will review your case and provide feedback on your appeal options at no cost.

All consultations are protected by attorney-client privilege. We respect your privacy and will not share your information.

Ready to protect your rights?

Appeal Attorney In Michigan are just a call away. Contact Us Today to discuss your post-conviction options and protect your rights

Frequently Asked Questions about the Michigan Court of Appeals

1. What is the Michigan Court of Appeals?

The Michigan Court of Appeals serves as the state's intermediate appellate court, reviewing decisions from lower trial courts, including circuit and probate courts, as well as certain administrative agencies. It ensures that legal errors in trial court proceedings are corrected and that the law is applied consistently across the state.

2. How is an appeal initiated in the Michigan Court of Appeals?

To initiate an appeal, a party must file a claim of appeal or an application for leave to appeal, depending on the nature of the case. This filing must occur within a specific timeframe, typically within 42 days after the entry of the judgment or order being appealed. It's essential to consult the Michigan Court Rules or seek legal advice to determine the appropriate procedure for your specific case.

3. What types of cases does the Michigan Court of Appeals hear?

The court hears a wide range of cases, including civil, criminal, family law, and administrative agency decisions. It does not conduct trials but reviews the records and arguments from the original proceedings to determine if legal errors were made that could have affected the outcome.

4. How long does the appellate process take in the Michigan Court of Appeals?

The duration of an appeal can vary based on the case's complexity and the court's docket. On average, the process may take approximately 18 months from the filing of the appeal to the court's decision. However, this timeline can differ, and some cases may be resolved more quickly or take longer.

5. Can I represent myself in the Michigan Court of Appeals?

Yes, individuals have the right to represent themselves, known as proceeding "pro se." However, appellate procedures are complex, and strict compliance with court rules is required. It is highly recommended to seek legal counsel to navigate the process effectively.

6. What are the possible outcomes of an appeal?

The Court of Appeals may affirm the lower court's decision, reverse it, remand the case back to the lower court for further proceedings, or modify the judgment. The specific outcome depends on the issues raised and the court's findings.

7. Where can I find more information about the Michigan Court of Appeals?

Additional information, including court rules, procedures, and resources, is available on the Michigan Courts' official website.

Read What Our Clients Says

Jerome Brown

I recently engaged Brownstone PA for legal assistance, and I couldn't be happier with the service I received. The lawyers were thorough, attentive, and always had my best interests in mind. They guided me through the legal process, explaining everything in a clear and concise manner. I felt confident in their abilities and trusted their expertise. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for their exceptional legal services.

Alyssa Lin

Brownstone PA is a highly professional and reliable law firm. The lawyers I worked with were knowledgeable, approachable, and provided me with excellent legal representation. They were responsive to my concerns and kept me informed throughout the entire process. The attention to detail and dedication to achieving the best possible outcome were evident in their work. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for anyone in need of legal assistance.

Amily Moalin

I had a positive experience with Brownstone PA and their team of lawyers. They handled my case with utmost professionalism and achieved a favorable outcome. The lawyers at Brownstone PA were thorough in their approach, conducting in-depth research and providing well-crafted legal arguments. They were also compassionate and supportive throughout the process. I am grateful for their expertise and highly recommend their services.