Trusted Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer

Expert post-conviction representation in your post-conviction journey

Get Appeal Evaluation

Our experienced attorneys will review your case and provide feedback on your appeal options at no cost.

All consultations are protected by attorney-client privilege. We respect your privacy and will not share your information.

What Is Post-Conviction Relief?

Post-conviction relief involves legal motions or petitions filed after a judgment has been finalized, especially after appeals have been exhausted. These motions seek to challenge the legality of the conviction on grounds such as new evidence, constitutional violations, or ineffective legal representation. Post-conviction relief aims to correct legal errors that may have resulted in an unjust conviction or sentence.

Grounds for Post-Conviction Relief

Post-conviction relief can be based on various grounds, including but not limited to:

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

When a defense attorney fails to provide adequate legal representation.

Newly Discovered Evidence

Evidence that could have changed the outcome of your trial.

Constitutional Violations

Issues like improper jury selection, unlawful search and seizure, or violation of your right to a fair trial.

Involuntary Plea

If you were coerced into pleading guilty or misled about the consequences of your plea.

Sentencing Errors

If your sentence is disproportionate or violates the law.

How Post-Conviction Cases Are Decided?

Post-conviction cases are decided based on several key factors, including:

1.Evidentiary Hearings:

  • Defendants may request a hearing to present new evidence or address claims of ineffective counsel.
  • Courts require petitioners to prove the need for an evidentiary hearing.

2.Legal Precedents:

  • Courts use precedents like Arvelo v. Florida to evaluate ineffective counsel claims.
  • Hill v. Lockhart helps determine whether a plea was voluntary and informed.

3.New Evidence and Constitutional Violations:

  • New evidence or violations of constitutional rights may be grounds for post-conviction relief.
  • Courts assess whether new evidence can change the conviction or sentence.

4.Sentence and Judgment Review:

  • Courts review whether the sentence or judgment was legally correct and fair.
  • Errors in sentencing or other legal issues can lead to sentence reduction or case reversal.

5.Ineffective Assistance of Counsel:

  • A claim of ineffective counsel can be made even if the defendant entered a plea.
  • Courts use the Strickland v. Washington test:
    • Deficient performance: The lawyer’s performance was below professional standards.
    • Prejudice: The inadequate performance affected the trial’s outcome.

How to Win an Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claim?

To successfully claim ineffective assistance of counsel, you must demonstrate the following:

Deficient Performance

Prove that your attorney’s performance was below the standard expected in criminal defense.

Prejudice

Show that this deficiency affected the outcome of your trial or sentence, making it likely that the result would have been different with competent representation.

Why Choose Brownstone as Your Post-Conviction Law Firm?

icons8-scales-100

Proven Success in Post-Conviction Relief

Thousands of successful cases filed, with a strong track record of securing relief at both state and federal levels.

icons8-graduation-cap-100

Expertise in Key Areas of Post-Conviction Relief

Specializing in ineffective counsel claims, habeas corpus petitions and sentence reduction motions.

icons8-courthouse-100 (1)

Nationwide Representation

Offering expert post-conviction legal services across all 50 states.

icons8-books-100

Experienced in Federal and State Cases

Skilled in navigating both federal and state courts to achieve favorable results.

icons8-handshake-100

Client-Centered Approach

Providing compassionate, personalized service to guide clients through the post-conviction process.

icons8-shield-100

Committed to Justice

Relentlessly working to uphold constitutional rights and secure the best possible outcome for clients.

Key Types of Post-Conviction Motions We Handle

Our firm is proficient in handling various types of post-conviction motions, each tailored to address the different aspects of the case.

Motions to Vacate a Judgment and Sentence

These motions seek to overturn a conviction or sentence based on new evidence, legal errors, or constitutional violations.

Motions to Vacate a Judgment and Sentence

These motions seek to overturn a conviction or sentence based on new evidence, legal errors, or constitutional violations.

Federal Habeas Corpus Motions

Federal habeas corpus motions are filed after all state-level remedies have been exhausted. These motions challenge convictions or sentences in the federal appellate court.

Motion to Reduce Sentence

Our expert team helps you file a motion to reduce your sentence if your sentence was unduly harsh or illegally imposed.

Motion for Newly Discovered Evidence

New evidence that could alter the outcome of your case can be grounds for filing a motion to reopen your case.

Motion for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

When an attorney fails to provide effective representation during a trial, we can help file a motion based on ineffective assistance of counsel.

Motion to Withdraw Plea

If you took a plea deal under pressure, confusion, or without fully understanding it, we can help you file a motion to withdraw your plea.

Explore Post-Conviction Relief Lawyers by State

We are familiar with the specific legal processes in each state, ensuring that your case is handled with the utmost attention to detail.

Major Supreme Court Cases that Shaped Post-Conviction Law

Several key Supreme Court decisions have significantly impacted post-conviction relief law, including:
Lafler v. Cooper, 566 US __ (2013).
The Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel extends to the plea-bargaining phase. Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012). A defendant’s 6th amendment right to counsel, and right to effective counsel, was abrogated when trial counsel entered a plea agreement that was 5 years in excess of the maximum amount discussed by the prosecution. Defense counsel should have at least attempted to enter a plea that matched what the prosecution offered in the pre-trial proceeding. By entering a plea different from what was discussed with the defendant, and not advocating for the lowest plea agreement on the table, the defense counsel violated a defendant’s 6th amendment right to counsel, which includes the right to effective counsel. Read more about plea agreements in Lafler v. Cooper.
Martinez v. Ryan, 566 U.S. 1 (2012)
This Supreme Court case holds that a federal habeas court may excuse a procedural default on an ineffective-assistance of trial counsel claim when state law requires that claim to be raised in a collateral proceeding and the claim was not preserved properly, but the prisoner had only ineffective counsel during the initial-review collateral proceeding.
Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 413, 428 (2013)
Trevino v. Thaler, 569 U.S. 413, 428 (2013) holding that when, as here, a state’s procedural framework, by reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez v. Ryan applies. Read more about post conviction:Martinez v. Ryan (Supreme Court Post Conviction) Contact a post conviction lawyer today (888) 233-8895

Ready to File a Post-Conviction Motion? We Can Help

If you believe your conviction or sentence is unjust, it’s time to act. Brownstone Law has extensive experience in post-conviction relief and is here to help you navigate the complex federal RICO or racketeering and conspiracy appeals in federal courts.. Whether you’re seeking to vacate your conviction, reduce your sentence, or file a writ of habeas corpus, our team is ready to fight for your rights.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Texas Court of Appeals System

1. What is the state post-conviction process?

The state post-conviction process allows a convicted person to challenge their conviction or sentence after their direct appeal has been denied or completed. This process is typically used to address issues such as ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or constitutional violations that were not raised during the original trial or appeal.

2. What types of relief can be sought through post-conviction motions?

Through post-conviction motions, an individual may seek to:

  • Vacate or set aside a conviction
  • Correct an illegal sentence
  • Seek a new trial based on new evidence or constitutional violations
  • Challenge a plea agreement
  • Request a reduction in sentence
  • Reverse a conviction due to ineffective assistance of counsel or other legal errors

3. What are the grounds for post-conviction relief?

Some common grounds for post-conviction relief include:

  • Ineffective assistance of counsel
  • Newly discovered evidence
  • Juror misconduct
  • Constitutional violations (e.g., unlawful search and seizure, violations of due process)
  • Involuntary plea agreements
  • False testimony or prosecutorial misconduct

4. How does the state post-conviction process differ from an appeal?

While an appeal reviews the trial court’s decisions for errors of law, the post-conviction process provides an opportunity to challenge a conviction or sentence based on issues that could not have been raised in the initial trial or appeal (such as ineffective assistance of counsel or new evidence). Post-conviction proceedings usually involve a deeper review of the facts and circumstances surrounding the case.

5. What is state habeas corpus?

State habeas corpus is a legal petition filed in state court challenging the lawfulness of an individual’s detention or imprisonment. While federal habeas corpus is used to challenge federal convictions, state habeas corpus is used to challenge state convictions or sentences.

6. How is state habeas used to lower a sentence?

State habeas corpus can be used to challenge the length or legality of a sentence. For example, if a defendant believes their sentence is unlawful, disproportionate, or imposed in violation of state or federal law, they can file a habeas petition requesting a reduction. Possible arguments include:

  • Excessive sentencing in violation of constitutional rights
  • Improper application of sentencing guidelines
  • New laws or rulings that affect the sentence
    State habeas can also be used to challenge a parole denial or to request sentence modification based on rehabilitative efforts.

7. Can state habeas be used to vacate a plea?

Yes, state habeas corpus can be used to vacate a plea if there are valid grounds to challenge the plea’s legality. Common reasons include:

  • Involuntary plea (e.g., the defendant did not fully understand the consequences of the plea)
  • Ineffective assistance of counsel during plea negotiations
  • Coercion or duress during the plea process
  • Misrepresentation or fraud by the prosecution or defense.

8. Can state habeas be used to set aside a conviction?

Yes, a state habeas petition can be used to set aside a conviction if the conviction was obtained in violation of the defendant’s rights. This includes situations where there was:

  • Ineffective assistance of counsel
  • Newly discovered evidence that proves innocence
  • Juror misconduct
  • False testimony or prosecutorial misconduct
  • Violation of constitutional rights during trial

9. How can state habeas help reverse a case for ineffective counsel?

State habeas corpus can be used to challenge a conviction if the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel. To succeed, the petitioner must show that their attorney's performance was deficient and that the deficiency resulted in prejudice—meaning that the outcome of the trial would likely have been different if the attorney had performed adequately.

10. What is the standard for proving ineffective counsel in a state habeas petition?

To prove ineffective assistance of counsel, the petitioner must satisfy the Strickland v. Washington test, which requires demonstrating:

  • The attorney’s performance was deficient (i.e., the lawyer made significant errors or failed to act in a reasonable manner).
  • The deficient performance prejudiced the defendant (i.e., there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different if the attorney had performed competently).

11. How long do I have to file a state habeas petition?

The time limits for filing a state habeas petition vary by state but are generally set at one year from the final judgment or from the date a legal error is discovered. In some cases, the time limit can be extended if new evidence comes to light.

12. How do I file a state habeas corpus petition?

To file a state habeas petition, you must:

  1. Determine the appropriate court: Petition in the court where you were convicted or another court that has jurisdiction.
  2. Prepare the petition: Clearly outline the grounds for challenging your conviction or sentence, and provide supporting evidence such as affidavits, documents, or witness testimony.
  3. File the petition: Submit the completed petition to the court and pay any required filing fees.
  4. Wait for a ruling: The court will review your petition and may schedule an evidentiary hearing if necessary. The judge may grant, deny, or request further action.

13. Can I appeal a decision in state habeas corpus cases?

Yes, if the state habeas petition is denied, the petitioner can generally appeal the decision to a higher state court, such as the state court of appeals or state supreme court.

Read What Our Clients Says

Jerome Brown

Jerome Brown

I recently engaged Brownstone PA for legal assistance, and I couldn't be happier with the service I received. The lawyers were thorough, attentive, and always had my best interests in mind. They guided me through the legal process, explaining everything in a clear and concise manner. I felt confident in their abilities and trusted their expertise. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for their exceptional legal services.

Alyssa Lin

Alyssa Lin

Brownstone PA is a highly professional and reliable law firm. The lawyers I worked with were knowledgeable, approachable, and provided me with excellent legal representation. They were responsive to my concerns and kept me informed throughout the entire process. The attention to detail and dedication to achieving the best possible outcome were evident in their work. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for anyone in need of legal assistance.

Amily Moalin

Amily Moalin

I had a positive experience with Brownstone PA and their team of lawyers. They handled my case with utmost professionalism and achieved a favorable outcome. The lawyers at Brownstone PA were thorough in their approach, conducting in-depth research and providing well-crafted legal arguments. They were also compassionate and supportive throughout the process. I am grateful for their expertise and highly recommend their services.

DMCA Protection Status