At Brownstone Law, our Michigan post-conviction attorneys have experience protecting our clients’ rights and reputation at every level of the law, from the Michigan Circuit Courts and the Michigan Court of Appeals, to the Michigan Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. For some, post-conviction relief is the last opportunity they have to set the record straight and defend their rights. This emphasizes the importance of working with a trusted and experienced team of attorneys.
In Michigan, the writs of habeas corpus may be filed at both the state and federal court level. If such a motion is successful, your freedom, your rights, and your reputation may all be restored. This is why it’s critical to pursue post-conviction relief and habeas corpus with everything you’ve got. At Brownstone Law, we place the full strength of our Michigan Post-Conviction team behind your case.
Learn about Michigan post-conviction relief and habeas corpus attorneys from Brownstone Law serving Lansing, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Sterling Heights, Warren, Flint, Romulus, Livonia, Dearborn, and Clinton, Michigan.
We represent clients with civil and criminal appeals throughout Michigan. Appellate law is highly complex and requires experienced and focused legal counsel. Our proficient criminal habeas corpus attorneys and law clerks stay abreast of the continually changing appellate law, allowing them to provide cutting-edge defense strategies for individuals and businesses seeking new trials, vacating prior convictions, reducing sentences, overturning a judgment, filing a motion of post-conviction, writs of habeas corpus and reprieves, commutations and pardons. Our Michigan habeas lawyers also handle post-conviction writs and petitions in Wayne County, Oakland County, Macomb County, Kent County, Genesee County, Washtenaw County, Ingham County, Saginaw County, St. Clair County, Berrien County, and Allegan County Michigan.
Both the United States Constitution and the Michigan Constitution provide the right to effective assistance of counsel. US Const, Am VI; Const 1963, art 1, § 20. To establish a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that trial counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that, but for counsel’s deficient performance, there is a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different people v Payne, 285 Mich. App. 181, 188-189 (2009); People v Matuszak, 263 Mich. App. 42, 57-58 (2004). “A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” People v Carbin, 463 Mich. 590, 600 (2001) (quotation omitted). Read more about rule 6500 motion for post-conviction relief and find a form 6500 habeas writ: Form Michigan Post Conviction Motion Rule 6500
Have a question about an appeal, or want to discuss an appellate case?
As you explore the exciting offerings at Nesbo, don’t miss the chance to discover even more thrilling opportunities. Take a break and enjoy some entertainment at Vavada official website, where endless fun awaits you.
