When a Florida trial court ruling puts your freedom, business, or family at risk, the next step is not another trial—it is a focused appeal. Brownstone Law is an appeals-only firm that represents clients statewide in Florida’s District Courts of Appeal, the Florida Supreme Court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Led by appellate attorney Robert L. Sirianni Jr., our team reviews the trial record, identifies preserved legal error, and builds briefs written for appellate judges—not juries. If you need a Florida appeal lawyer after conviction, judgment, or an adverse order.
Our experienced attorneys will review your case and provide feedback on your appeal options at no cost.
All consultations are protected by attorney-client privilege. We respect your privacy and will not share your information.
Our Florida criminal appeal lawyers represent clients challenging convictions, sentences, and critical trial rulings in state and federal court. Common grounds include:
We handle appeals arising from white-collar prosecutions, drug trafficking, fraud, violent felonies, and other serious state and federal charges. Where direct appeal rights are limited or exhausted, we evaluate post-conviction and habeas options.
Our Florida civil appeals attorneys represent appellants and appellees in business, commercial, property, insurance, probate, family-law, and professional disputes. We appear in:
Whether you are defending a hard-won judgment or seeking to reverse an unfair ruling, we develop a precise issue list and a brief strategy grounded in Florida appellate procedure.
Representative federal appellate matters include:
Federal appellate practice demands strict compliance with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and circuit-specific briefing rules. Our team is built for that discipline.
Florida’s appellate map changed in 2023 with the creation of the Sixth District Court of Appeal. Which District Court of Appeal hears your case depends on the judicial circuit where it originated. Your Florida appellate lawyer must file in the correct DCA and comply with all deadlines under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure
| Court | Headquarters | Circuits Served |
|---|---|---|
| 1st DCA | Tallahassee, Leon County - Second Judicial Circuit | 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 8th and 14th |
| 2nd DCA | Pinellas County - Sixth Judicial Circuit | 6th, 12th and 13th |
| 3rd DCA | Miami-Dade County - Eleventh Judicial Circuit | 11th and 16th |
| 4th DCA | Palm Beach County - Fifteenth Judicial Circuit | 15th, 17th and 19th |
| 5th DCA | Daytona Beach, Volusia County - Seventh Judicial Circuit | 4th, 5th, 7th and 18th |
| 6th DCA | Lakeland, Polk County - Tenth Judicial Circuit | 9th, 10th and 20th |
IMPORTANT NOTE – The above headquarters column follows the official designations used in section 35.05 of the Florida Statutes and the 2024 HB 353 staff analysis. For the Second DCA, the statutory headquarters designation is Pinellas County. The court’s December 1, 2025 Internal Operating Procedures list its physical location as 525 Mirror Lake Drive North in St. Petersburg. References to Tampa in some earlier sources relate to the court’s temporary location while the St. Petersburg courthouse was being completed. These location descriptions do not affect the Second DCA’s territorial jurisdiction, which covers the 6th, 12th and 13th Judicial Circuits.
Issues that commonly support appellate relief include:
Our Florida appellate attorneys support clients at all stages of the case—before, during, and after trial. We focus exclusively on appeals and can assist in a range of ways:
We represent clients throughout Florida, including Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Tallahassee, Naples, Fort Myers, St. Petersburg, and surrounding communities.
Our Florida appellate lawyers proudly serve clients in cities across the state, including:
Brownstone overturns verdict in Rashia Wilson appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. In Appeal No. 13-13468, Rashia Wilson, pursuant to a plea agreement, pleaded guilty to two counts of a 57-count indictment returned against her and Maurice J. Larry: Count Three, wire fraud committed on April 21, 2012, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; and Count Forty-Seven, aggravated identity theft committed the same day in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A.
Read the opinion vacating the case and charges for tax fraud. Rashia Wilson
Following a jury trial, Mr. Smith explained to the Trial Court that a seated juror may have failed to disclose that she knew details about his case during jury selection. Mr. Smith requested to interview the juror. The Trial Court denied Mr.Smith’s request. Download Appellant’s Complete Initial Brief
The Appellant, Patrick James Clark, by and through the undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 9.141(b)(3) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, hereby appeals the denial of his Amended Motion for Post-Conviction Relief. This Court has jurisdiction over the instant appeal pursuant to Rule 9.110(b) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Download Appellant’s Complete Initial Brief
This case arises from allegations that Petitioner shot Mr. Aprid Balint (“Mr. Balint”) with a .44 caliber rifle on October 20, 2006 as Mr. Balint menacingly waived a bush axe and advanced towards Petitioner. Read more about this Florida appeal here: Boyington v. Florida – Supreme Court of Florida – First District Court of Appeal
Appellants, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering (DBPR), License Acquisitions, LLC, and West Volusia Racing, Inc., f/k/a Volusia Jai-Alai, Inc., appeal the First District’s per curiam decision declaring section 550.054(14)(a) to be invalid as a special law enacted without either providing advance notice of intent to enact the law or conditioning the law’s effectiveness upon a referendum of the electors of the areas affected in violation of article III, section 10, of the Florida Constitution. Based on this ruling, the district court concluded that the trial court should have granted the appellees’ motion for summary judgment.
Read more about this Florida appeal here: License Acquisitions v. Debary Real Estate Holdings
Appellant, Alan Lyndell Wade appeals an order of the circuit court denying his motion to vacate his convictions and sentences—including two convictions for first-degree murder and two sentences of death—filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. Wade was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of kidnapping, and two counts of robbery in connection with the murders of Carol and Reggie Sumner in July 2005. Wade v. State, 41 So. 3d 857, 862 (Fla. 2010). Wade and his codefendants, Michael Jackson and Tiffany Cole, were tried separately for the crimes. Bruce Nixon was also involved in the crimes but pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree murder and received concurrent sentences of forty-five years in prison.
Read more about this Florida Supreme Court Criminal appeal here: Florida Criminal Appeal – Alan Wade v. State of Florida
If you’re considering an appeal, don’t wait. Our team offers free consultations to review your case, explain your legal options, and guide you through the appellate process.
Most appeals from Florida trial courts are heard by one of the state’s six District Courts of Appeal. A DCA generally reviews whether the trial court made a legal or procedural error, and qualifying appeals may be taken as a matter of right.
The Florida Supreme Court, by contrast, does not provide another automatic level of appeal merely because a party disagrees with a DCA’s decision. Its jurisdiction is limited to specific categories established by the Florida Constitution and other applicable law. These include certain death-penalty judgments, DCA decisions declaring a state statute or constitutional provision invalid, decisions involving express and direct conflict, questions certified as being of great public importance, and certain decisions expressly construing constitutional provisions or affecting classes of public officers.
Therefore, a party seeking Florida Supreme Court review must establish a recognized basis for the Court’s jurisdiction; dissatisfaction with the DCA’s ruling alone is not sufficient.
A trial lawyer may handle an appeal if they have substantial experience with Florida appellate procedure. However, appellate advocacy requires a different strategy from trial work.
Appellate lawyers focus on the existing record, preserved legal errors, standards of review and persuasive written briefs. In complex cases, appellate counsel may also provide an independent assessment of the record and help identify the strongest issues for review.
Brownstone Law focuses on state and federal appeals and can evaluate whether a case presents viable appellate grounds. Although no lawyer can guarantee a reversal, appellate-focused representation can help ensure that the case is presented through a clear, disciplined and record-based strategy.
Possible results include reversal, remand for a new trial or further proceedings, resentencing, or modification of the judgment. The government or opposing party may seek rehearing or further review. Your lawyer should explain the realistic range of outcomes for your specific issues.
Yes. We handle Florida state appellate matters and federal appeals, including cases proceeding to the Eleventh Circuit and, when appropriate, petitions for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.
I recently engaged Brownstone PA for legal assistance, and I couldn't be happier with the service I received. The lawyers were thorough, attentive, and always had my best interests in mind. They guided me through the legal process, explaining everything in a clear and concise manner. I felt confident in their abilities and trusted their expertise. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for their exceptional legal services.
Brownstone PA is a highly professional and reliable law firm. The lawyers I worked with were knowledgeable, approachable, and provided me with excellent legal representation. They were responsive to my concerns and kept me informed throughout the entire process. The attention to detail and dedication to achieving the best possible outcome were evident in their work. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for anyone in need of legal assistance.
I had a positive experience with Brownstone PA and their team of lawyers. They handled my case with utmost professionalism and achieved a favorable outcome. The lawyers at Brownstone PA were thorough in their approach, conducting in-depth research and providing well-crafted legal arguments. They were also compassionate and supportive throughout the process. I am grateful for their expertise and highly recommend their services.