Texas Appeal Lawyers for State and Federal Appeals

Brownstone Law represents clients in Texas criminal, civil, and federal appeals. Our Texas appeal lawyers evaluate trial-court records, identify appealable errors, prepare appellate briefs, and represent clients before Texas appellate courts and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

Our attorneys will review the available information and discuss potential appeal options.

Texas: (214) 272-2833 and Main Office: 1-888-233-8895 (Toll-Free) or Send Us an Email to get an appeal evaluation robert@brownstonelaw.com

Get Appeal Evaluation

Our experienced attorneys will review your case and provide feedback on your appeal options at no cost.

All consultations are protected by attorney-client privilege. We respect your privacy and will not share your information.

Appeal Lawyers in Texas for Criminal, Civil, and Federal Cases

An appeal requires more than disagreeing with a court’s decision. The appellant must identify a reviewable legal or procedural error, demonstrate where that issue appears in the trial-court record, and explain why it justifies appellate relief.

Our appeal lawyers in Texas represent clients seeking review of criminal convictions, civil judgments, federal court decisions, and other appealable orders. Depending on the case, appellate representation may include:

  • determining whether the judgment or order can be appealed;
  • calculating the applicable notice-of-appeal deadline;
  • reviewing the trial record and preserved objections;
  • identifying the strongest appellate issues;
  • applying the appropriate standard of review;
  • preparing appellate motions and briefs;
  • presenting oral argument when granted; and
  • evaluating rehearing or further appellate review.

The court, rules, filing deadline, and available relief depend on whether the case arose in the Texas state system or federal court. Understanding that distinction is therefore one of the first steps in evaluating an appeal.

Difference Between Texas State Appeals and Federal Appeals

Texas state appeals and federal appeals follow different rules and move through different court systems. The correct path depends on which court entered the judgment, whether the matter is civil or criminal, and what type of order is being challenged.

Issue
Texas state appeal
Federal appeal arising in Texas
Starting court
A Texas district, county, or other trial court with an appealable judgment or order
A U.S. district court or another federal tribunal with an appealable decision
Appellate court
One of Texas's intermediate courts of appeals, subject to the court's jurisdiction
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in most federal cases arising in Texas
Governing rules
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and applicable statutes
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Fifth Circuit rules, and applicable statutes
Highest Texas court
Supreme Court of Texas for civil and juvenile matters; Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for criminal matters
Further review may be sought in the U.S. Supreme Court, usually through a petition for a writ of certiorari
Nature of further review
Often discretionary after the intermediate appeal
U.S. Supreme Court review is discretionary in most cases

Types of Appeals We Handle in Texas

Our firm has extensive experience handling federal appeals across Texas, including criminal, civil, and administrative cases. We are committed to providing you with the best representation before the Fifth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Texas Criminal Appeals

Brownstone Law represents people seeking review of Texas criminal convictions, sentences, and other appealable criminal rulings. A criminal appeal may raise an error that appears in the trial record, including:

  • improperly admitted or excluded evidence;
  • incorrect jury instructions;
  • insufficient evidence to support a conviction;
  • constitutional violations preserved for appellate review;
  • prosecutorial misconduct reflected in the record;
  • an unlawful or incorrectly calculated sentence;
  • denial of a significant pretrial or trial motion; or
  • another legal error that may have affected the judgment.

The existence of an error does not automatically require reversal. The appellate court considers the applicable standard of review, whether the issue was preserved, and whether the error was harmful under the governing law.

Direct criminal appeals are also different from post-conviction applications. A direct appeal generally reviews errors shown by the trial record. Claims that depend on evidence outside that record may need to be raised through a different procedure.

Texas Civil Appeals

Our Texas civil appeals practice includes review of final judgments and appealable interlocutory orders in business disputes, commercial litigation, insurance matters, shareholder disputes, and other complex civil cases accepted by the firm.

A civil appeal may involve:

  • an incorrect interpretation of a statute or contract;
  • erroneous summary judgment or judgment as a matter of law;
  • improper admission or exclusion of evidence;
  • incorrect jury instructions or charge error;
  • lack of legally or factually sufficient evidence;
  • an abuse of discretion;
  • jurisdictional error; or
  • an order for damages or equitable relief that is not supported by the governing law.

An appellate lawyer does not simply repeat the trial arguments. Counsel must identify reviewable issues, select the strongest arguments, apply the appropriate standard of review, and explain why the error warrants appellate relief.

Texas Federal Criminal Appeals

We handle federal criminal appeals arising from convictions, sentences, plea proceedings, and other appealable rulings entered by federal courts in Texas. These appeals generally proceed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

A federal criminal appeal may involve:

  • an incorrectly calculated or unlawful sentence;
  • improper admission or exclusion of evidence;
  • constitutional violations preserved in the district court;
  • errors involving a guilty plea or plea agreement;
  • insufficient evidence supporting a conviction;
  • incorrect jury instructions;
  • denial of a significant pretrial or trial motion; or
  • another preserved legal error affecting the conviction or sentence.

A federal criminal appeal is different from a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A direct appeal ordinarily addresses issues shown by the district-court record. A Section 2255 motion is a collateral proceeding filed in the sentencing court and may address certain constitutional or jurisdictional claims, including some ineffective-assistance claims. The appropriate procedure depends on the claim, record, prior proceedings, and applicable deadlines.

Texas Federal Civil Appeals

Brownstone Law represents clients in updating federal civil judgments and appealable orders entered by federal courts in Texas. These matters generally proceed to the Fifth Circuit.

A federal civil appeal may involve:

  • an erroneous dismissal or summary judgment;
  • an incorrect interpretation of federal law;
  • constitutional or jurisdictional questions;
  • improperly admitted or excluded evidence;
  • an abuse of discretion;
  • errors involving damages or equitable relief;
  • regulatory or administrative issues; or
  • complex business, securities, or commercial disputes.

Federal appellate counsel determines whether the decision is final or otherwise appealable, identifies the controlling standard of review, evaluates preservation of error, and prepares briefs that comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Fifth Circuit rules.

Administrative and Specialized Appeals

Not every matter called an “appeal” follows the ordinary Texas appellate process. Some disputes begin before a government agency, administrative tribunal, appraisal review board, justice court, or another specialized decision-maker.

Specialized proceedings may include:

  • unemployment-benefit appeals;
  • property-tax protests and appraisal disputes;
  • eviction appeals;
  • workers’ compensation disputes;
  • Medicaid or SNAP benefit appeals;
  • professional-licensing matters; and
  • other state or federal agency proceedings.

These matters can have distinct filing deadlines, hearing procedures, evidentiary rules, exhaustion requirements, and standards of judicial review. Some may proceed through an administrative review process before a party can seek relief in court.

Understanding the Texas Appellate Court System

Texas has 15 intermediate courts of appeals. These courts exercise appellate jurisdiction within their geographic districts, subject to constitutional and statutory provisions. The Fifteenth Court of Appeals has statewide civil intermediate appellate jurisdiction in specified matters, including certain cases involving the state and certain business-court appeals.

Texas has two state courts of last resort:

  • The Supreme Court of Texas is the state’s highest court for civil and juvenile matters.
  • The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the state’s highest court for criminal matters. Direct appeals in death-penalty cases proceed to that court under Texas law.

Most civil and non-death-penalty criminal cases first proceed from a trial court to the appropriate intermediate court of appeals. Further review by the Supreme Court of Texas or Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is generally discretionary and requires the proper petition or application; it is not simply an automatic second appeal.

What Does the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Do?

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reviews criminal matters within its jurisdiction. Its work includes petitions for discretionary review, direct review of death-penalty cases, and certain post-conviction writ proceedings. It is distinct from Texas’s intermediate courts of appeals and from the federal Fifth Circuit.

How To File an Appeal in Texas?

To file an appeal in Texas, a party generally begins by filing a notice of appeal in the trial court that entered the judgment or appealable order. Filing the notice starts the appellate process, but it does not by itself present the legal arguments or suspend enforcement of the judgment.

The usual stages include:

  • Confirm appellate jurisdiction. Determine whether the court has entered a final judgment or an interlocutory order that the law permits a party to appeal.
  • Calculate the deadline. Identify the governing state or federal rule and account for any qualifying post-trial motion, accelerated procedure, or special statute.
  • File the notice of appeal. The notice is ordinarily filed with the clerk of the court that issued the judgment or order.
  • Arrange the appellate record. The clerk’s record and, when necessary, the reporter’s record provide the materials the appellate court may review.
  • Identify and brief the issues. The appellant’s brief explains the alleged error, the standard of review, supporting authority, harm, and requested relief.
  • Respond and reply. The appellee may file a response, and the appellant may be permitted to reply.
  • Prepare for oral argument if granted. Many appeals are decided on the briefs. When argument is scheduled, counsel answers the judges’ questions and addresses the controlling issues.
  • Review the decision and next options. Depending on the result and governing rules, a party may evaluate rehearing, en banc consideration, discretionary state high-court review, or a petition for certiorari.

Filing requirements vary significantly. A person should not assume that an ordinary deadline applies to an accelerated appeal, restricted appeal, eviction matter, agency proceeding, or another specialized case.

How We Handle Texas Appeals

Case Evaluation and Deadline Review

We begin by identifying the judgment or order, the relevant court, the procedural posture, and any immediate filing deadline. We also consider whether a direct appeal, discretionary petition, post-conviction proceeding, or another remedy may apply.

Record Review and Issue Selection

Our attorneys examine the available pleadings, motions, rulings, transcripts, exhibits, and post-trial filings. Effective appellate advocacy requires prioritizing the issues most likely to affect the judgment rather than presenting every conceivable disagreement.

Legal Research and Appellate Briefing

We research the controlling statutes, rules, and precedent and prepare briefs that explain the error, standard of review, preservation, harm, and requested relief. Clear written advocacy is central because many appeals are decided without oral argument.

Oral Argument and Further Review

When oral argument is granted, we prepare to address the panel's questions and the issues that may determine the appeal. After a decision, we assess whether rehearing, en banc review, discretionary state high-court review, or U.S. Supreme Court review is legally available and strategically appropriate.

Clear Client Communication

We explain the appellate stages, material deadlines, available arguments, and possible outcomes. No attorney can guarantee reversal, but clients should understand the legal strategy and procedural status of their case.

Post-Conviction Relief and Habeas Corpus

Handling Post-Conviction Motions

We help clients file post-conviction motions to challenge trial court decisions, addressing ineffective counsel and other issues. Our goal is to seek a fair and just resolution for our clients.

Habeas Corpus Appeals

Habeas corpus petitions are an essential tool for challenging unlawful convictions. We guide clients through the habeas corpus process in Texas federal and state courts, working tirelessly to protect their rights.

The Focus of Appeal Lawyers in Texas for Federal Appeals Includes

Writs of Certiorari
0
9th Circuit Busiest Circuit Court
0
Petitions for Review
0

Why Choose Brownstone Law for a Texas Appeal?

  • Appellate focus: Brownstone Law concentrates on state and federal appellate litigation and related post-conviction matters.
  • State and federal representation: The firm handles accepted matters in Texas appellate courts and federal appeals, including Fifth Circuit proceedings.
  • Record-based case evaluation: Our attorneys evaluate the judgment, procedural history, preserved objections, available record, and standards of review.
  • Strategic briefing: We select and develop legally supported issues rather than treating an appeal as a repetition of the trial.
  • Direct communication: Clients receive explanations of the appellate process, potential outcomes, and important procedural developments.

News and Publications: Texas Appeals

Douglas Paul Carter v. State of Texas (2018)
Case No. PD-1449, Appeal from Tarrant County Texas

Appellant Douglas Paul Carter was convicted of possessing one gram or more, but less than four grams, of a controlled substance, namely heroin. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.115(a), (c); 481.102(2) (West 2010 & Supp. 2015). After conviction and sentence, court costs were imposed including a $133 consolidated court cost. See Tex. Local Gov’t Code Ann. 102(a)(1) (West 2008 & Supp. 2015). On appeal, Appellant claimed that portions of the section 133.102 consolidated court cost relating to “law enforcement officers standards and education,” “comprehensive rehabilitation,” and “abused children’s counseling” were unconstitutional. Obtain a form petition for discretionary review: Texas-Petition-for-Discretionary-Review-Form. The court of appeals rejected the claim. On December 22, 2016, Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review, asking us: Did the court of appeals err in holding that Section 133.102(a)(1) of the Texas Local Government Code by which the “consolidated court cost” was assessed is not facially unconstitutional? Read more about this criminal appeal in Texas: Texas Criminal Appeals.
State of Texas v. Craig Graham
November 4th, 2013 Case No. 08-13-00115 Robert Sirianni, Jr

In this case, the Appellant contests a criminal case in Texas. Read More about this Criminal Appeal by clicking here. Craig Graham – Texas Criminal Appeals – Murder Appeal
United States of America v. Keith Aiken
December 12th 2013 Case No. 13-50917

Mr. Aiken was charged by an indictment on January 9, 2013 with two counts of making false statements to government officials in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2). (Doc. 1). A jury trial was held from June 24 to June 27, 2013. Ultimately, the jury found Mr. Aiken guilty of both counts. (Doc. 72). On September 20, 2013, the district court sentenced Mr. Aiken to concurrent terms of three years’ probation. (Doc. 89). Learn more about Brownstone’s criminal appeal for Keith Aiken.
Mullinax v. State of Texas
November 3, 2014; Case No. 13-50917

During cross-examination, the State questioned Mr. Mullinax regarding extraneous prior bad acts that were wholly unrelated to the charged offense. Those acts included arson and revocation of probation for consuming marijuana. The State introduced evidence that Mr. Mullinax was given a two-year prison sentence for the violation of probation. Learn more about Brownstone’s Texas criminal appeal: Texas Criminal Appeal – Mullinax. State of Texas
Theisen v. State of Texas
November 13, 2014; Case No. 04-00637

During Voir Dire, at least one juror explained she would likely become biased against Theisen if the victim’s family was particularly emotional or reacted in a certain way during trial. She explained the emotions and reactions of the family could negatively affect her ability to consider the entire range of punishment in this case.
Did the trial court abuse its discretion in denying Theisen’s motion for mistrial where the victim’s son screamed an obscenity at Theisen during the trial, told Theisen to look at what he had done, charged at Theisen and had to be escorted out of the courtroom by deputies, all in front of the jury? Learn more about Brownstone’s Texas criminal appeal: Criminal Appeal – Theisen v. State of Texas

Contact Our Texas Appellate Lawyers Today

Reach out for a comprehensive review of your case and legal options.

Contact the Law Office of Robert Sirianni today for a comprehensive review of your case. Our team will help you understand your legal options and provide the expert guidance you need to navigate the appellate process successfully.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. What Circuit Court of Appeals Is Texas In?

Texas is within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The Fifth Circuit reviews federal appeals arising from federal district courts in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

Federal cases arising in Texas generally come from the Northern, Southern, Eastern, or Western District of Texas. A federal appeals lawyer may:

  • determine whether a judgment or order is appealable;
  • calculate the notice-of-appeal deadline;
  • review the district-court record and preserved errors;
  • identify the applicable standard of review;
  • research and select appellate issues;
  • prepare opening, response, and reply briefs;
  • address jurisdictional questions and procedural motions;
  • prepare for oral argument when appropriate; and
  • evaluate rehearing, en banc, or U.S. Supreme Court review.

Federal appeals are governed by applicable jurisdictional statutes, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and the Fifth Circuit’s rules. The notice of appeal is generally filed in the federal district court that entered the judgment or appealable order, not directly in the Fifth Circuit.

Q2. How Long Do You Have to File an Appeal in Texas?

In an ordinary Texas civil case, the notice of appeal is generally due within 30 days after the judgment is signed. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, the period may extend to 90 days when a party timely files certain qualifying post-judgment documents. Accelerated and restricted appeals follow different timelines.

For a Texas criminal defendant, the notice of appeal is generally due within 30 days after sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the trial court enters an appealable order. The period generally becomes 90 days when the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.

Federal deadlines are different. Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4, a notice of appeal in an ordinary federal civil case is generally due within 30 days after entry of the judgment or order, although different rules may apply when the United States or a federal officer or agency is a party. A federal criminal defendant generally has 14 days after entry of the judgment or order being appealed, subject to the rule's specific provisions.

These are general rules, not a deadline calculation for a particular case. The type of order, post-trial filings, service, party status, and specialized statutes can change the analysis. Missing an appellate deadline can limit or eliminate review, so prompt case-specific advice is essential.

Q3. How Long Does an Appeal Take in Texas?

A Texas appeal may take several months to more than a year, but there is no single duration that applies to every case. Timing depends on the type of appeal, the length of the record, transcript preparation, briefing extensions, the court's docket, whether oral argument is granted, and whether a party seeks rehearing or further review.

The process usually includes record preparation, briefing, possible oral argument, submission to the court, and issuance of an opinion or order. Accelerated appeals move under shorter procedural schedules. Complex civil or criminal cases with extensive records can take longer.

An appellate lawyer can explain the expected stages after reviewing the court, case type, record, and current procedural status, but no lawyer can guarantee when the court will issue a decision.

Q4. What Is an Appeal Bond in Texas?

An appeal bond is a bond required in certain proceedings or used to secure obligations associated with appellate review. In an ordinary civil case, filing a notice of appeal does not necessarily stop enforcement of the judgment. A judgment debtor may need to supersede the judgment, often through a bond, deposit, or other method authorized by Texas law, to suspend enforcement while the appeal is pending.

The amount and type of security depend on the judgment, the governing rules, statutory limits, and trial-court orders. Eviction appeals and other specialized matters have separate bond and payment requirements. An appeal bond should therefore not be described as a universal fee that every Texas appellant must pay.

Q5. How to Choose a Texas Appeal Lawyer?

To choose a Texas appeal lawyer, look for an attorney with substantial appellate experience who understands the court handling the appeal, the trial record, the legal issues involved, and the applicable procedural requirements. The right appellate lawyer should be able to assess whether an appeal is viable, identify critical deadlines and preservation issues, and develop arguments based on the existing record.

When evaluating a Texas appeal lawyer, consider the following:

  • Appellate experience: Look for an attorney who regularly handles appeals rather than primarily practicing trial-level law.
  • Relevant court experience: Consider whether the lawyer has experience before the Texas court handling the case, such as a Texas Court of Appeals or the Texas Supreme Court. Federal appeals require experience with the applicable federal appellate court.
  • Procedural knowledge: The lawyer should be able to identify jurisdictional requirements, filing deadlines, and other procedural issues that could affect the appeal.
  • Record review: An appeal generally focuses on the existing trial-court record rather than presenting the case as a new trial. The attorney should thoroughly review the record to identify preserved errors and supportable appellate arguments.
  • Preservation of error: The lawyer should understand whether alleged errors were properly preserved for appellate review and how preservation affects the issues that can be raised on appeal.
  • Legal research and brief writing: Strong appellate representation requires extensive legal research and persuasive written briefs supported by applicable authority.
  • Oral argument experience: If oral argument is permitted or granted, consider whether the attorney has experience preparing for and presenting appellate arguments.
  • Clear representation terms: Before retaining counsel, confirm what services are included, how the attorney's fees are calculated, and whether additional costs may apply.
  • Realistic case assessment: A qualified appellate lawyer should explain the potential strengths, weaknesses, risks, and procedural limitations of the case without guaranteeing a particular outcome.

Q6. How many courts of appeals are there in Texas?

Texas has 15 intermediate courts of appeals. Most serve geographic appellate districts. The Fifteenth Court of Appeals has statewide civil intermediate appellate jurisdiction over specified categories of cases.

Q7. Is an appeal a new trial?

No. An appeal ordinarily asks a higher court to review the existing record for legal or procedural error. The appellate court generally does not hear witnesses again or consider new evidence. If the judgment is reversed and the case is remanded, a new trial or other lower-court proceeding may follow.

Q8. Can a Texas court of appeals decision be appealed further?

Further review may be available, but it is usually discretionary. Depending on whether the case is civil or criminal, a party may seek review in the Supreme Court of Texas or Texas Court of Criminal Appeals using the procedure required by the applicable rules. A federal question may sometimes support a petition for a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court after state-court review is complete.

Q9. What Is the Supreme Court of Texas?

The Supreme Court of Texas is the state's highest court for civil and juvenile cases. It has final appellate jurisdiction over most civil and juvenile matters and oversees the Texas judicial system.

Q10. How are judges selected for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals?

In Texas, judges of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals are elected by voters in statewide partisan elections. They serve six-year terms. If a vacancy occurs between elections, the governor appoints a replacement to serve until the next general election.

Read What Our Clients Says

Jerome Brown

Jerome Brown

I recently engaged Brownstone PA for legal assistance, and I couldn't be happier with the service I received. The lawyers were thorough, attentive, and always had my best interests in mind. They guided me through the legal process, explaining everything in a clear and concise manner. I felt confident in their abilities and trusted their expertise. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for their exceptional legal services.

Alyssa Lin

Alyssa Lin

Brownstone PA is a highly professional and reliable law firm. The lawyers I worked with were knowledgeable, approachable, and provided me with excellent legal representation. They were responsive to my concerns and kept me informed throughout the entire process. The attention to detail and dedication to achieving the best possible outcome were evident in their work. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for anyone in need of legal assistance.

Amily Moalin

Amily Moalin

I had a positive experience with Brownstone PA and their team of lawyers. They handled my case with utmost professionalism and achieved a favorable outcome. The lawyers at Brownstone PA were thorough in their approach, conducting in-depth research and providing well-crafted legal arguments. They were also compassionate and supportive throughout the process. I am grateful for their expertise and highly recommend their services.

DMCA Protection Status