Are you not satisfied with how your trial went during your criminal or civil case? Has your life been permanently changed because of a ruling that the trial judge laid down? Then you need to contact our law firm today to file an appeal. The Michigan court of appeals is said to be one of the highest volume intermediate appellate courts in the country. You need an appeal attorney in Michigan who has the ability to handle the appeals process for you. Contact our Michigan Appeals Attorneys to review your case at 1-(313) 246-8004 for a free consultation.
The Michigan appeal lawyers at our firm can represent clients across the state. Brownstone represents businesses and individuals in Detroit, Grand Rapids, Warren, Sterling Heights, Lansing and Ann Arbor. We are in the position to advance any federal case in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal and before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Contact our appellate attorneys today for a free consultation today at 1-313-246-8004 for a free consultation.
Michigan Appellate Law Firm 1-(313) 246-8004
and get FREE REVIEW
of your case now!
Civil Appeal Attorney in Michigan
Our appeal attorney in Michigan can handle civil cases and trials throughout the state, handling securities, fraud, SEC, tax, RICO, medical, Medicaid, Medicare, intellectual property, business torts, corporate investigations, broker dealer, insurance recovery, eminent domain and takings and healthcare appeals. Our business and civil appeals lawyers handle complex appellate matters before the Supreme Court of Michigan.
We may represent clients on appeal and handle habeas corpus petitions. An criminal appeal in Michigan is granted to a federal defendant for rectifying any errors made during his trial. The error could have been significant and influenced the court’s decision. Our law firm can appeal jury verdicts and issues decided by the judge, who has to authorize a new witness or evidence that may have an impact on the outcome of the case. Brownstone Law can also appeal these rulings and the objections raised during this process to form the grounds for an appeal. Read more about the Michigan Supreme Court and appeals in Michigan.
Post-conviction relief may be available if there was an error in the trial or hearing that resulted in a conviction. The law firm is able to handle Michigan post-conviction work in Lansing, Detroit, Warren, Grand Rapids, Ann Arbor, Sterling Heights Flint, Clinton, and Dearborn, Michigan. Most post convictions are under Rule 6.500, Michigan Rule of Criminal Procedure.
A defendant may move to vacate, set aside, or correct the judgment or sentence in a criminal case. Post-conviction litigation is a unique legal area that may be available to people who have been convicted of a crime after appeal rights have been exhausted. You may also qualify to withdraw your plea. Connect with Brownstone Law Firm today.
Appeal Attorney in Michigan
are just a call away
Dial 1-(313) 246-8004 now for free review of your case
Michigan Criminal Appeal Attorneys
Our firm focuses on federal appeals before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for the United States. Brownstone Law Firm can represent clients facing a civil or criminal appeal while also handling post-conviction motions, and rule 6.500 petitions for habeas corpus relief or motions to vacate a conviction and sentence. Learn more about the post-conviction procedures in Michigan.
Know your rights, protect yourself and work with a Michigan appeal lawyer from Brownstone Law. Whether you have a federal, criminal or civil case, you may need an appeals attorney to handle your case. The appeal attorney in Michigan at our firm has the ability to handle a variety of appeals. Our law firm handles appeals in Pontiac, Detroit, Lansing, and Grand Rapids. A Michigan appeals lawyer at our firm will review your case and provide a consultation on the best issues for appeal.
If you have lost a case in Michigan criminal court, it’s important to hire a Michigan appellate lawyer who is dedicated to appeals. Because we focus specifically on appeals, we thrive at helping people overturn an unfair verdict on their case. Our appellate criminal lawyers in Michigan provide aggressive strategies and resources that best serve the needs of our clients and will get your case seen by a higher court.
The Michigan Court of Appeals is said to be one of the highest volume intermediate appellate courts in the country. It was created by the Michigan Constitution of 1963, Article IV Section 1. The Court is divided into four districts and presided over by a total of 48 judges. Since 1998, the filings process has been decentralized, with district offices of the Clerk fully processing all cases, comprehensive streamlining of case management, and cases expedited towards final disposition under deadline established by the court rules.
Some litigators bring in an appellate adjunct prior to an appeal to benefit from broader expertise. Our appeals attorneys in Michigan also represent clients in Flint Michigan Court of Appeals and appellate courts in Lansing Michigan. We co-counsel on appeals, which includes conducting legal research and creating motions and briefs.
We also handle Michigan criminal federal appeals including firearm conviction federal appeals. Our knowledge of and experience in appellate procedures, as well as a keen familiarity representing clients in the Michigan Court of Appeals, makes us a valuable ally. We assist in easing the complexity and challenges faced in an appellate court by providing deep insights and effective counsel that increases the chances of a favorable outcome.
Trial lawyers who’ve just finished sweating it out in trial court may sometimes fail to view the decisive issue or not see it in its entirety. Here’s where our appeal attorneys in Michigan can be of vital assistance. We understand the case thoroughly and then proceed to write compelling and elegant briefs that contain decisive issues and present the right arguments.
Contentions are stated clearly, with the most important ones addressed first, a full and convincing but not conclusory analysis, and addressing issues not raised by the opposing party. Substantial time and effort are expended in editing. Connect with Brownstone Law and Robert Sirianni today to review your case.
Our Michigan federal appellate law firm is dedicated to federal appeals in both civil and criminal cases. We practice in Detroit and in every federal court in the country. Our Michigan federal appeal lawyers represent clients in a wide range of areas and legal disputes. The managing appeal lawyer, Mr. Robert Sirianni, appears in federal courts in Michigan and before the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for the United States. Call us today at 1-(313) 246-8004.
Our law firm is nationally recognized for our legal services within the federal courts of appeal. The Michigan federal appeal lawyers at Brownstone represent some of the largest businesses in the country before all the federal courts of appeal.
We are one of the most active appellate law firms in the nation. Appeals involving complex criminal cases are becoming more and more difficult. The Michigan federal appeal attorneys at Brownstone handle drug appeals, habeas corpus and post-conviction cases, trafficking appeals, federal crime appeals, drug possession appeals, white collar crime appeals. The complicated federal criminal appeals go to a handful of experienced firms in the nation. We are an elite Michigan federal criminal appeal law firm from which our appeal lawyers stand out from other firms throughout the nation.
Our appellate practice group is based on experienced and a highly disciplined criminal appellate team. We handle high profile appellate cases in Michigan and Detroit and our federal appeal law office is often called upon to brief difficult criminal cases in the federal courts of appeal throughout the nation.
Let our Federal Appeal Attorney in Michigan help you
Dial 1-(313) 246-8004
Get free consultation and initial case review.
Michigan Federal Criminal Appeal Lawyers
Our clients rely on our skilled Michigan federal appeal lawyers to address matters in federal court. Our federal appeal lawyers are licensed in every federal court of appeal in the nation and will fight for your rights following an unfair conviction or sentence. We are regarded and respected for our appellate work and will take on your case if we believe we can have a successful outcome for you. Brownstone and our lawyers strive to deliver results and strategic solutions for our clients at the federal court appeal level concerning Michigan appeals.
Year after year we are recognized as a heavyweight in appellate litigation. The lawyers at our firm build appeals and cases from the ground up. Our Detroit federal appeal lawyers have handled hundreds of appeals and are among an exceptional group of litigators who have a genuine enthusiasm for appellate litigation. Our lawyers also handle cases in Flint and Pontiac.
Federal Appeals Lawyers in Michigan
Our Michigan appellate practice group is called upon to address some of the most important issues our clients will face. Clients depend on our appeals team to master the details of each cases. Our firm handles criminal and civil complex appellate litigation arguments. The firm’s reputation for appellate work is well known across the country, as we think creatively and aim to deliver an appellate victory for our clients.
We are interested in our clients and understand the issues confronting them during a civil or criminal appeal, with each federal case treated with the utmost care and attention. The Detroit, Michigan federal appeal lawyers at our firm protect and maximize your opportunity to win on appeal before the Sixth Circuit or U.S. Supreme Court. Connect with our Michigan federal appeal lawyers at 1-(313) 246-8004.
RON VANALSTINE, and JOAN VANALSTINE v. LAND O’LAKES PURINA FEEDS, LLC
Plaintiffs operate a dairy farm in Eaton County. Defendant is a Minnesota corporation that manufactures and distributes animal feed and related products. Diversified Farms, LLC (Diversified) is a distributor of those products in Michigan. In July 2008, Diversified executed a Credit Application and Agreement (the Credit Agreement) with defendant that included a disclaimer of warranties and a remedy-limiting provision. “A motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) tests the factual sufficiency of a claim, and is appropriately granted when, except as to the amount of damages, there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Tomra of North America, Inc v Dep’t of Treasury.
We review de novo issues of statutory and contractual interpretation. Heritage Resources, Inc v Caterpillar Fin Servs Corp, 284 Mich App 617, 632; 774 NW2d 332 (2009). Plaintiffs were not parties to the Credit Agreement. Read more about this civil appeal in Michigan: Michigan Appeals.
United States v. Jerry Duval
June 4th, 2013, Case No. 12-2338
Appellants challenge the constitutionality of Michigan Marijuana Act Read More about this Constitutional Appeal by clicking here. Jerry Duval Brief in Federal Court – Medical Marijuana
Bhan v. Battle Creek Health
August 19th, 2013, Case No. 13-1682
This case arises out of the suspension of Dr. Raakesh Bhan’s medical staff privileges at two Michigan hospitals: Battle Creek Health System (“BCHS”), located in Calhoun County, and Borgess Medical Center (“Borgess”), located in Kalamazoo County. Read more about this Michigan appeal here: Bhan v. Battle Creek Health – United States Court of Appeals – Western District of Michigan
United States v. Jonathan Agbebiyi
November 25th, 2013, Case No. 12-2559, Robert L. Sirianni, Esq.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 34(a), Appellant, Jonathan Agbebiyi, M.D. (“Dr. Agbebiyi”), respectfully requests oral argument because the Court’s consideration of the issues presented by this appeal may be assisted or advanced by the presence of counsel before the Court to comment upon the issues and respond to inquiries from the Court. Read more about this Michigan appeal here: USA v. Agbebiyi – United States Court of Appeals – Eastern District of Michigan
Lashawn Redmond v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
December 2, 2014, Case No. 1-0111348
This is a civil appeal in Michigan. As the concurrence states: Moody was wrongly decided on both legal and practical grounds and should be overruled. Pursuant to MCR 7.215(J)(1), the Court must follow Moody despite a concurring judge’s disagreement with it. This would normally lead the Court to request a special conflict panel pursuant to MCR 7.215(J)(2). However, because the Supreme Court has granted leave to appeal in Moody, the Court believe such a request would be inappropriate.
Read more about this Michigan civil appeal here: Michigan Civil Appeal – Redmond v. State Farm Mutual Automobile
Mattie King v. Park West Galleries, Inc.
December 2, 2014, Case No. 314188
This case stems from a cruise plaintiff took in April of 1999 with her now deceased husband. While aboard the ship, plaintiff and her late husband decided to attend a shipboard auction put on by defendant Park West Galleries, Inc. During this auction, plaintiff purchased a complete set of Salvador Dali’s Divine Comedy collection. This art collection was represented by Park West’s auctioneer as a good investment that would increase in value over time. Further, defendant’s auctioneer stated that these works had been signed by Dali.
Plaintiff purchased the works at the auction for $165,000. Plaintiff, as part of the purchase, received certificates of authenticity and appraisals to ensure that representations made by Park West’s auctioneer were accurate. Defendant Albert Scaglione, the CEO of defendant Park West Galleries, Inc., signed the documents, and they were mailed to plaintiff after the cruise was over.
Read more about this Michigan civil appeal here: Mattie King v. Park West Galleries
People v. Leon Finnie, Jr.
December 2, 2014, Case No. 314200
Defendant appeals as of right his jury trial convictions of assault with intent to commit murder, MCL 750.83; torture, MCL 750.85; and two counts of unlawful imprisonment, MCL 750.349b. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 20 to 40 years’ imprisonment for the assault with intent to commit murder conviction, 20 to 40 years for the torture conviction, and 8 to 15 years for each of the unlawful imprisonment convictions. Because there was sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of assault with intent to murder, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony or allowing the late endorsement.
Read more about this Michigan criminal appeal here: Michigan Criminal Appeal – People of the State of Michigan v. Leon Finnie
