If you are involved in a criminal case in which decision was not rendered in your favor, you can always seek the assistance of criminal defense appeal lawyers and criminal appellate attorneys to represent you in the court of law to perfect your appeal. Criminal appeals and federal crime appeals– whatever the scope and kind of appeal you intend to file, you need the services of criminal appeal lawyers to back you up. In addition to this, appeals is a narrow area of court relief that only the knowledge and skills of criminal appellate attorneys possess. With this, looking for great criminal appeal lawyers is the first thing you should be considering.
Contact our criminal appeals attorneys today at 1-888-233-8895 for a free consultation.
If you have been wrongfully convicted of a crime or feel that justice has not been carried out in your criminal case, call Robert Sirianni. Our experienced criminal appeal attorneys focus on appeals and only appeals. This means that, with our criminal appeal lawyers, you can expect a level of fierce determination and commitment to your well-being that you will not find at any other law firm. From the first time you contact us, you will be able to trust us with your appellate case. No appeal is too large or too small for us to give it our full attention. Understanding the appeal process for your type of case, whether it be a criminal issue in state or federal court. We appeal cases and overturn a previous ruling or jury trial. Speak with our experienced criminal appeal attorneys and let us help you get the outcome you deserve. Our criminal appellate law firm is lead by Robert Sirianni. We can take any criminal cases to the next level, representing clients in federal and state courts. Return to our main appellate attorneys page.
Criminal appeals are a lot more common than you may think. In this world, hardly anything is “final,” including your conviction. An experienced criminal appellate lawyer can help you take your case back to court. You may receive a completely new not-guilty verdict or have your sentence reduced. Contact our criminal appeal lawyers 1-888-233-8895.
The criminal appeal lawyers at our firm are experienced in handling federal appeals. This is brought by the fact that we know how it can be disheartening to a family if one of its member is to be sent to prison by the state. Thus, criminal appeals should be pursued with vigilance. Criminal defense is similar in all states in the United States because the criminal laws of the country are governed by federal laws. There are various reasons why a person may be sent to jail for a crime. One reason can be because of being an felony offense or arrest or indictment. Violation of state and federal criminal laws and committing crimes are also grounds for arrest and sentencing. Our criminal defense appeal attorneys are familiar with the several ways on how to help the clients win felony appeals. If the client is detained by state authorities, we can post-custody on bond for the release of the client.
At the end of a trial, you can make a direct appeal to the judge to overrule the jury’s decision. But this route is risky because rarely will the judge grant such an appeal. The better and more common option is to petition your criminal conviction or sentence in a higher court.
Note that the appeal can be filed only after the trial court has passed the final judgment or order. This is to prevent delays that can arise from waiting for appeals on every ruling made by the judge.
Prospective clients always want to know whether appealing is akin to a retrial. The short answer is no; in a state or federal criminal appeal, your Brownstone criminal appeal lawyers will attack the order or judgment of the court on some legal grounds. That is, the facts presenting during the trail won’t be reopened, rather your criminal appeal attorneys will raise the legal errors arising that may have risen in the state or federal trial court in question.
You can appeal the conviction or the sentencing. For instance, if you have been convicted of securities fraud, but sentenced to a harsh prison sentence that you believe to be unreasonable, you can appeal only the prison term and let the conviction remain.
Since Brownstone Law focuses on all areas of the criminal appellate law concerning the appellate court system, our clients can be sure of getting high quality legal representation with a winning strategy. Criminal appeal cases follow procedures specific of the Criminal Court of Appeals. For a successful outcome, we believe that it is essential for the clients themselves to understand such complexities and therefore, offer free consultations with our experienced in Criminal Defense Appeals to help them review their case, get their appeal filed and the process started.
Our criminal attorney work with both businesses and individuals within the appellate court system. We provide strong legal advice and representation, giving you the best chance of success in front of the criminal appellate courts. Our briefs are thoroughly researched and our arguments pursue every avenue to gain a ruling in your favor. Contact our criminal defense appeal lawyers at (888) 233-8895.
The appeals court may issue a ruling based on the written briefs or hear an oral argument. It may then either uphold the decision, modify the ruling, order a new trial and very rarely, throw out the case. While the rate of successful appeals is low, grounds involving a denial of constitutional rights are almost always overturned by appellate courts.
Call us to discuss your criminal appeal 1-888-233-8895.
Members of the legal fraternity can give testimony that the Supreme Court appeals rules and procedure are quite complex when compared to the trial court proceedings. For instance, tight deadlines have to be followed in each stage of filing for a petition or else the case is inadmissible. A practical example is a motion of habeas corpus which has to be filed within one year and three months from the date of conviction. Defendants who are keen on winning their appeals therefore don’t have an option but to look for criminal appellate attorneys who are highly experienced and know what they are doing.
Connect with our criminal appeals attorneys to review your arrest, judgment, indictment, or sentencing at 888-233-8895.
Case No. 17-765
Respondents Victor J. Stitt and Jason Daniel Sims were each convicted in federal court of unlawfully possessing a firearm, in violation of 18 U. S. C. §922(g)(1). The sentencing judge in each case imposed the mandatory minimum 15-year prison term that the Armed Career Criminal Act requires for §922(g)(1) offenders who have at least three previous convictions for certain “violent” or drug-related felonies, §924(e)(1). The Act defines “violent felony” to mean, among other things, “any crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year . . . that . . . is burglary.” §924(e)(2)(B). Respondents’ prior convictions were for violations of state burglary statutes—a Tennessee statute in Stitt’s case and an Arkansas statute in Sims’ case— that prohibit burglary of a structure or vehicle that has been adapted or is customarily used for overnight accommodation. In both cases, the District Courts found that the state statutory crimes fell within the scope of the federal Act’s term “burglary.” The relevant Court of Appeals in each case disagreed, vacated the sentence, and remanded for resentencing. Read more about this Supreme Court criminal appeal by clicking here: Supreme Court Criminal Appeals
Case No. 17-5716
The five petitioners pleaded guilty to drug conspiracy charges that subjected them to mandatory minimum sentences under 21 U. S. C. §841(b)(1). Before imposing their sentences, the District Court calculated their advisory Guidelines ranges. But because the top end of the Guidelines ranges fell below the mandatory minimums, the court concluded that the mandatory minimums superseded the Guidelines ranges. After discarding these ranges, the court departed downward from the mandatory minimums under 18 U. S. C. §3553(e) to reflect petitioners’ substantial assistance to the Government in prosecuting other drug offenders. In settling on the final sentences, the court considered the relevant “substantial assistance factors” set out in the Guidelines, but it did not consider the original Guidelines ranges that it had earlier discarded. After petitioners were sentenced, the Sentencing Commission amended the Guidelines and reduced the base offense levels for certain drug offenses, including those for which petitioners were convicted. Petitioners sought sentence reductions under §3582(c)(2), which makes defendants eligible if they were sentenced “based on a sentencing range” that was later lowered by the Sentencing Commission. The courts below held that petitioners were not eligible because they could not show that their sentences were “based on” the now lowered Guidelines ranges. Learn more about criminal appeals attorney: Koons v. United States of America
Speak with an appellate lawyer.