Our experienced attorneys will review your case and provide feedback on your appeal options at no cost.
All consultations are protected by attorney-client privilege. We respect your privacy and will not share your information.
The U.S. Supreme Court is generally the final level of appeal in the United States court system. The highest court in the U.S. court system has discretionary jurisdiction, meaning it hears only a small percentage of cases.
A U.S. Supreme Court appellate lawyer files a petition for writ of certiorari to request that the Supreme Court review a lower court’s decision. You have 90 days to file a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court from the final order or judgment.
Appellate cases and writs before the Supreme Court of the United States are complex. We appear at oral argument to present the case before the Court. Clients benefit from our in-depth knowledge of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and federal process.
A petition for writ of certiorari is a formal request to the Supreme Court to review a lower court’s decision. The petition must clearly identify significant legal issues that may involve a constitutional question, a conflict between appellate courts, or a matter of national importance. The court will grant certiorari only if your case has a broader legal impact beyond the individual dispute.
Even when you have legal grounds to file the petition, you must carefully structure your petition, write a high-quality brief, frame the legal questions, include strong legal arguments, and cite relevant precedent.
The Court has discretionary jurisdiction, which means it chooses which cases to review. Each year, thousands of Americans file petitions for writ of certiorari, and most of them are denied without a detailed explanation.
You must strictly comply with the court’s procedural rules to file a petition.
File the petition within 90 days. The timeline starts from the date of judgment, not from the issuance of the mandate.
The petition must strictly comply with the court’s proper format and other requirements. Clearly present the legal questions, relevant facts, and reasons to request a review.
Pay the $300 fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis to request a fee waiver if you cannot afford the filing cost.
The petition must be filed by a member of the Supreme Court bar or the petitioner acting pro se.
According to Supreme Court Rule 12, you must file 40 copies of the petition. If proceeding in forma pauperis, you need an original and 10 copies.
Submit your petition to the Clerk of the Supreme Court. Representation by counsel requires electronic filing.
A writ of mandamus is issued by the Supreme Court as a judicial remedy to require a subordinate court, public authority, or corporation to do (or not do) something. Though the writ of mandamus is not commonly issued by the modern United States Supreme Court, it is still a legal option that many of our clients are interested in seeking out.
If you are not receiving justice at the state level, then you may wish to petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting the Supreme Court to step in and help ensure the state law is upheld. Our firm is experienced in helping clients petition for a writ of mandamus.
The U.S. Supreme Court hears the following types of appeals:
Our Supreme Court appeal lawyers represent clients across the United States. As experienced U.S. Supreme Court lawyers, we defend victories for our clients and seek relief by filing an appeal for our clients on the losing end.
We understand the complex nature of arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court. Our attorneys include former law clerks and lawyers with experience filing petitions in the Supreme Court in both civil and criminal cases.
Our appellate practice team is led by Robert Sirianni, one of the most strategic appellate thinkers in his field. We have the experience to create solid briefs and arguments for our clients. The Supreme Court appeal attorneys at our firm have the experience necessary to help you with your fight against the government.
Appeals before the Supreme Court are always serious business. While most law firms dream of taking cases to the United States Supreme Court, our appellate lawyers have experience in representing clients in this powerful arena.
Our federal appellate law firm is a business that’s built upon experience. Not only are our Supreme Court appellate lawyers highly qualified and committed to research, but they also have the experience to match their credentials.
The federal appeals attorneys for the United States Supreme Court at our law firm file writs and appeals in the United States Supreme Court. We have filed appeals on cases involving environmental, securities, white collar crime, oil and gas, conspiracy, insurance disputes, constitutional, criminal, regulatory, eminent domain, and business torts.
Act fast because the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari is limited. Appeals from federal courts generally go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the circuit in which the case arose. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which handles many federal and administrative cases, is located at 430 E St NW, Washington, DC 20001.
What differentiates us from other appellate attorney firms is that we have the manpower and knowledgeable attorneys not just to take on numerous cases across all levels of complexity, but also to give each the individualized attention they need for a favorable verdict. The firm also handles Second Amendment constitutional cases and federal firearm appeals.
Supreme Court appellate litigation requires nuanced skill quite different from trial law. Our appellate advocates have effectively pursued appeals and post-conviction writ cases to give clients the respite they need from erroneous decisions in trial courts. We’re familiar with the strategies used by prosecutors and the strategies they use before appellate judges.
We’re also quick to recognize that sometimes judges pronounce sentences that are much harsher than warranted, while at other times, a lack of credible evidence still results in a conviction. Rest assured that Brownstone Supreme Court attorneys are here to overturn any injustice meted out to you. Contact Robert Sirianni, an appellate lawyer, to speak about your federal appeal.
We have a strong work ethic and go the extra mile to conduct the necessary investigation to strengthen your case. We’re pros at preparing elegant briefs that present our positions compellingly and are always up to the task of orally arguing your case with great conviction.
Supreme Court docketed matters with Sirianni listed as Counsel of Record: 14 (applications + petitions). (Supreme Court)
Cert petitions shown as filed on these dockets: 3 (23-508, 24-848, 24-928). (Supreme Court)
| Date (docket entry) | Docket No. | Type | Party name (per docket) | Outcome / status | Supreme Court docket |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2022 | 22A88 | Application to extend time to file cert | Earnest Eugene Padillow | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Apr 5, 2023 | 22A870 | Application to extend time to file cert | Hieu Minh Le | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Jun 21, 2023 | 22A1099 | Application to extend time to file cert | Isaac Ashton | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Jul 18, 2023 | 23A36 | Application to extend time to file cert | Jerry J. Davis, Jr. | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Jul 18, 2023 | 23A39 | Application to extend time to file cert | Micah Sherif Matthews | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Nov 10, 2023 | 23-508 | Petition for writ of certiorari filed | Micah Sherif Matthews | Petition denied (Jan 16, 2024) | The docket shows filing + denial and Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Nov 20, 2023 | 23A435 | Application to extend time to file cert | Ilana Bangiyev | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Jun 10, 2024 | 23A1094 | Application to extend time to file cert | Daniel A. Madero | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Dec 18, 2024 | 24A601 | Application to extend time to file cert | Anne Catherine Richard | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Dec 20, 2024 | 24A602 | Application to extend time to file cert | Zackery Terrell | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Jan 2, 2025 | 24A646 | Application (emergency-type) | American Medical Equipment, Inc. | Denied | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Jan 19, 2025 | 24A701 | Application to extend time to file cert | Karl Hansen | Granted | Docket lists Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Feb 4, 2025 | 24-848 | Petition for writ of certiorari filed | Anne Catherine Richard | Petition denied (Apr 21, 2025) | Docket shows petition filed + denial and Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
| Apr 28, 2025 | 24-928 | Petition for writ of certiorari | Zackery Terrell | Petition denied (Apr 28, 2025) | Docket shows distribution/waiver/denial and Sirianni as Counsel of Record. (Supreme Court) |
To appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, you must file a petition for a writ of certiorari, which asks the Court to review the decision of a lower appellate court. The petition must present legal issues of national significance or constitutional importance.
A writ of certiorari is an order by the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision of a lower court. It is discretionary, meaning the Court can choose whether or not to accept the case.
It can take several months. The Court reviews petitions in batches during its terms, and only a small percentage of petitions are granted.
The U.S. Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions each year but grants only about 1% of them. Cases with significant constitutional issues or those that create conflicting decisions in lower courts are more likely to be accepted.
The U.S. Supreme Court handles cases that involve:
Yes, the Court can hear criminal cases, especially those that involve constitutional violations, such as due process or ineffective assistance of counsel.
No, the Court selectively hears cases that present significant legal issues, especially those that have broad implications for the country or resolve conflicting decisions among lower courts.
Robert L. Sirianni, Jr., and his team at Brownstone Law have filed numerous cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, primarily involving complex federal questions and constitutional law. Brownstone is known for handling high-profile appeals in both state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. However, exact numbers may vary depending on the year and specific cases involved.
Brownstone Law has handled cases related to:
Yes, Robert L. Sirianni, Jr. and the team at Brownstone Law are experienced in appellate law, including handling petitions for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. They can provide assistance in preparing and filing your petition.
A list of Supreme Court lawyers includes Robert Sirianni, Jr., Paul Clement, Carter Phillips, and many others. Please find this list of Supreme Court lawyers.
I recently engaged Brownstone PA for legal assistance, and I couldn't be happier with the service I received. The lawyers were thorough, attentive, and always had my best interests in mind. They guided me through the legal process, explaining everything in a clear and concise manner. I felt confident in their abilities and trusted their expertise. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for their exceptional legal services.
Brownstone PA is a highly professional and reliable law firm. The lawyers I worked with were knowledgeable, approachable, and provided me with excellent legal representation. They were responsive to my concerns and kept me informed throughout the entire process. The attention to detail and dedication to achieving the best possible outcome were evident in their work. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for anyone in need of legal assistance.
I had a positive experience with Brownstone PA and their team of lawyers. They handled my case with utmost professionalism and achieved a favorable outcome. The lawyers at Brownstone PA were thorough in their approach, conducting in-depth research and providing well-crafted legal arguments. They were also compassionate and supportive throughout the process. I am grateful for their expertise and highly recommend their services.
©2026 Brownstone Appellate Law Firm
