Our experienced attorneys will review your case and provide feedback on your appeal options at no cost.
All consultations are protected by attorney-client privilege. We respect your privacy and will not share your information.
An appeals lawyer reviews trial court records to identify legal errors and presents arguments to a higher court to reverse or modify the decision. No new evidence is introduced during an appeal.
When requested, courts may also allow oral argument in some cases. We strongly argue in court to highlight how errors in the trial court affected the decision.
“An appeal isn’t about retrying your case—it’s about showing where the trial court got it wrong.”
— Robert Sirianni, Texas appeal lawyer
We handle both state and federal appellate matters, including:
Texas has 15 Courts of Appeals, each serving a specific region. These courts review most civil and criminal appeals from trial courts.
| Court of Appeals | Region |
|---|---|
| First Court of Appeals | Houston |
| Second Court of Appeals | Fort Worth |
| Third Court of Appeals | Austin |
| Fourth Court of Appeals | San Antonio |
| Fifth Court of Appeals | Dallas |
| Sixth Court of Appeals | Texarkana |
| Seventh Court of Appeals | Amarillo |
| Eighth Court of Appeals | El Paso |
| Ninth Court of Appeals | Beaumont |
| Tenth Court of Appeals | Waco |
If your case originated in Houston or Harris County, it will typically be reviewed by:
According to the Texas Judicial Branch, each appellate court has jurisdiction over cases within its geographic region.
Federal cases from Houston are appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
As outlined by the United States Courts, federal appellate courts review decisions from U.S. district courts within their circuit.
An appeal is a legal process in which a higher court reviews a trial court’s decision to determine whether a legal error affected the outcome.
An appellate court does not hear new evidence or testimony. Instead, it reviews the trial record and legal arguments presented in written briefs.
| Jurisdiction | Case Type | Deadline (days) |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Criminal | 30 |
| Texas | Civil | 30 |
| Federal | Criminal | 14 |
| Federal | Civil | 30 |
| Decision | Description |
|---|---|
| Affirmed | The original judgment stands |
| Reversed | The decision is overturned |
| Remanded | The case is sent back with instructions |
| Modified | Part of the decision is changed |
| Dismissed | The appeal is dismissed |
Robert Sirianni
Robert L. Sirianni, Jr., Esq. is the President and Managing Partner of Brownstone Law, where his practice is devoted exclusively to appellate litigation in federal and state courts nationwide. With over two decades of experience, he has handled thousands of appeals involving criminal, civil, and constitutional law, and is licensed to practice before every U.S. federal court of appeal, including the U.S. Supreme Court. His background includes work with the U.S. Department of Justice, the Solicitor General’s Office, and roles within the White House and Congress, giving him deep insight into complex appellate matters.
A gas supplier (El Paso) sued a power plant owner (Wolf Hollow) seeking declarations construing the contract between the parties. The power plant counterclaimed for breach of contract and sued the pipeline transporter (Enterprise) for negligence, seeking a total of over $7.7 million in consequential damages. Only the breach of contract and declaratory judgment claims between the gas supplier and the plant owner remain.
Read the opinion of the Court of Appeal in the Texas Supreme Court: Texas Civil Appeals – El Paso Marketing v. Wolf Hollow
In a tort suit between an injured plaintiff and his former employer, both of these parties have wrongfully added the employer’s liability insurer, Essex Insurance Company (“Essex”), as a defendant in the same suit—in direct contravention of the no-direct-action rule and established principles of justiciability. Their maneuver appears to be a well-timed ploy to create pressure on Essex to fund a non-covered claim. Essex is already providing a defense to its insured under a reservation of rights, but these other parties are requiring Essex’ participation in the suit as a direct party, and the District Court is improperly compelling Essex to do so.
Read the opinion of the Court of Appeal in the Texas Supreme Court: Texas Supreme Court Appeal – In Re Essex Insurance Company
Petition for Discretionary Review in Texas. The question in this case deals with preservation of error. Appellant was convicted of possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. arts. 481.102(3)(D), 481.112(a) (Vernon Supp. 2002). Police stopped appellant’s van after he made an illegal left turn, and while checking his driver’s license, they learned he had two outstanding arrest warrants.
Upon arresting appellant, the officers performed an inventory search on the van and discovered what appeared to be drug paraphernalia sitting in an open box in plain view. Shortly thereafter, one of the officers found what appeared to be a diaper wrapped tightly in a plastic bag. Inside the diaper was a white substance, which tested positively as cocaine, weighing 28.75 grams.
Houston is served by two intermediate appellate courts:
Yes, but appeals involve complex procedural rules and legal standards. Most cases benefit from experienced appellate representation.
The timeline varies depending on case complexity and court workload, but most appeals take several months to over a year.
You can visit:
I recently engaged Brownstone PA for legal assistance, and I couldn't be happier with the service I received. The lawyers were thorough, attentive, and always had my best interests in mind. They guided me through the legal process, explaining everything in a clear and concise manner. I felt confident in their abilities and trusted their expertise. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for their exceptional legal services.
Brownstone PA is a highly professional and reliable law firm. The lawyers I worked with were knowledgeable, approachable, and provided me with excellent legal representation. They were responsive to my concerns and kept me informed throughout the entire process. The attention to detail and dedication to achieving the best possible outcome were evident in their work. I highly recommend Brownstone PA for anyone in need of legal assistance.
I had a positive experience with Brownstone PA and their team of lawyers. They handled my case with utmost professionalism and achieved a favorable outcome. The lawyers at Brownstone PA were thorough in their approach, conducting in-depth research and providing well-crafted legal arguments. They were also compassionate and supportive throughout the process. I am grateful for their expertise and highly recommend their services.
©2026 Brownstone Appellate Law Firm