BLOG!
Brownstone Law

Supreme Court Rules Police Cannot Search Suspects’ Cell Phone Without Warrant

The U.S. Supreme Court has recently ruled on a case that will have wide impact on the way law enforcement collects evidence in the digital age. As a federal appeals lawyer discusses, warrantless searches of a suspect’s cell phone have been held unconstitutional in most cases.

Would you like to read about: Federal Appeals Court Denies Terrorism Suspect Access to Government Files Used Against Him

The Background of the Case

The issue before the court was whether police must first obtain a warrant before searching data on a criminal suspect’s cell phone. A host of information can be obtained on the devices such as photographs, browsing history, contact information, incoming and outgoing calls, GPS positioning, etc. Much of this information can prove critical in investigating a crime. However, as the court has long held, citizens are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures of their homes and vehicles. The court has now brought cell phones into the prohibition against warrantless searches fold. This ruling will likely be used to require warrants for other devices such as laptop computers, iPads, etc.

The Balance the Court Has Taken

Chief Justice Roberts recognized that requiring warrants before searching cell phone data would make law enforcement more difficult, but he believed that the court has struck a reasonable balance. By the time an officer has secured a cell phone from a suspect, any immediate danger to the officer is usually long past. The opposition raised concerns that phones are subject to remote wipe technology. Justice Roberts reasoned that an officer can easily turn off the phone, remove the battery or put it in a foil bag to prevent that from happening. Finally, the new ruling will still allow officers to search cell phones without a warrant in the case of exigent circumstances that can be reviewed on a case by case basis.

Would you like to read about: What is a Petition for Writ of Certiorari and What Does the Supreme Court Do?

To discuss your case with a knowledgeable, compassionate federal appeals lawyer, contact the offices of Brownstone Law. To schedule your appointment to discuss your case and your available legal options call 855.776.2773.

See Also: FAA Dashes Amazon’s Hopes for Drone Delivery, At Least For Now

Authors
Federal Appeal Lawyers In Antitrust
Author Name
Robert L Sirianni
(888) 233-8895
    Related Posts
    BLOG!

    Supreme Court Rules Police Cannot Search Suspects’ Cell Phone Without Warrant

    Table of Contents

    The U.S. Supreme Court has recently ruled on a case that will have wide impact on the way law enforcement collects evidence in the digital age. As a federal appeals lawyer discusses, warrantless searches of a suspect’s cell phone have been held unconstitutional in most cases.

    Would you like to read about: Federal Appeals Court Denies Terrorism Suspect Access to Government Files Used Against Him

    The Background of the Case

    The issue before the court was whether police must first obtain a warrant before searching data on a criminal suspect’s cell phone. A host of information can be obtained on the devices such as photographs, browsing history, contact information, incoming and outgoing calls, GPS positioning, etc. Much of this information can prove critical in investigating a crime. However, as the court has long held, citizens are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures of their homes and vehicles. The court has now brought cell phones into the prohibition against warrantless searches fold. This ruling will likely be used to require warrants for other devices such as laptop computers, iPads, etc.

    The Balance the Court Has Taken

    Chief Justice Roberts recognized that requiring warrants before searching cell phone data would make law enforcement more difficult, but he believed that the court has struck a reasonable balance. By the time an officer has secured a cell phone from a suspect, any immediate danger to the officer is usually long past. The opposition raised concerns that phones are subject to remote wipe technology. Justice Roberts reasoned that an officer can easily turn off the phone, remove the battery or put it in a foil bag to prevent that from happening. Finally, the new ruling will still allow officers to search cell phones without a warrant in the case of exigent circumstances that can be reviewed on a case by case basis.

    Would you like to read about: What is a Petition for Writ of Certiorari and What Does the Supreme Court Do?

    To discuss your case with a knowledgeable, compassionate federal appeals lawyer, contact the offices of Brownstone Law. To schedule your appointment to discuss your case and your available legal options call 855.776.2773.

    See Also: FAA Dashes Amazon’s Hopes for Drone Delivery, At Least For Now

    Recent Posts

    Grounds for Filing a Federal Appeal in New York: A Comprehensive Guide 

    Rob Sirianni May 26, 2025
    0

    In the complex landscape of the United States judicial system, understanding the grounds for filing

    Uncategorized

    What is a Federal Appeal and How Does it Work? 

    Rob Sirianni May 26, 2025
    0

    In the intricate world of U.S. federal courts, the federal appeal process serves as a

    Uncategorized

    Why Hiring a Dedicated Appellate Law Firm Can Make or Break Your Case  

    Rob Sirianni May 1, 2025
    0

    The complex and specialized field of appellate law requires expertise, precision, and methodical knowledge of

    civil-appeal
    DMCA Protection Status